They may have made the argument as to why they want it, but they have not made any arguments as to why this is beneficial for society. And allowing same-sex marriage in Australia will not introduce new relationships or new child-rearing arrangements. Our relationships are just as loving and valid as heterosexual relationships, but our current marriage laws suggest it is not. The Suffragettes famously marched together because they needed an excuse to compare clothing. For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother; and shall cleave to his wife. The Vital Statistics Agency of British Columbia's online birth registration process demonstrates this to be a somewhat exaggerated assertion. D in economics , ah, that explains it!
31 arguments against gay marriage (and why they’re all wrong)
The situation described here is where a child has been raised, usually to quite a significant age, by one set of parents and then is replaced by another. If a complementary relationship hinges on procreative sex, are these relationships unnatural? Like this I believe we need to protect the words we use. Summary: This list is getting strange. Today, there are an estimated , people in the United States who carry the HIV virus and don't even know it. Assumption 3: Marriage is a human right Certainly, the UN Declaration of Human Rights UNHDR asserts that human beings have the right to form families, so to that extent it can be argued that being able to marry and to form families is a human right.
How same-sex marriage could ruin civilisation | Dean Burnett | Science | The Guardian
It also implies a nefarious gay mafia that is out to wreck marriage for straight people. Premise 1': All romantic love is equal The argument is now that the romantic love between a homosexual couple is the same as that between a heterosexual couple. As for the slippery slope, can you tell me how many people in history have had the desire to marry another animal or tree? From a metaphysical point of view, this requires us to understand what enables something to be considered of the same species. This is not simply a quirk of definition, but names an essential feature of the community and of the state.
He will always be deprived of either a mother or a father role model. It would have been beyond the pale. The divorce and sexual revolutions of the last four decades have seriously undercut the norm that couples should get and stay married if they intend to have children, are expecting a child, or already have children. The latter are intrinsically barren and hence cannot be life giving. I'm not a historian, but a quick read of the history of marriage makes it clear that it has evolved and changed throughout history and that the current version is a relatively recent phenomenon. Also, making a serious argument of a Chris Rock stand-up comedy bit. Father absence creates risks in children that mother absence does not create.